{"id":42736,"date":"2025-06-02T09:20:04","date_gmt":"2025-06-02T09:20:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/isafespend.com\/?p=42736"},"modified":"2025-06-02T09:20:05","modified_gmt":"2025-06-02T09:20:05","slug":"nothing-beautiful-about-21-cuts-to-social-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/isafespend.com\/?p=42736","title":{"rendered":"Nothing Beautiful About 21% Cuts To Social Security"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

In first 200 days into President Trump\u2019s second administration, Social Security is under both overt and covert attack. Though there are no dramatic cuts to Social Security being proposed, don\u2019t be fooled \u2013 doing nothing is doing something bad.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s what people are asking, and what they need to know.<\/p>\n

Q: What role does Social Security play in American seniors’ retirement now?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Social Security is the foundation of retirement income for a majority of older Americans. Nearly 90% of people over 65 receive benefits, and for 40% of them, it accounts for more than half of their income. For about 1 in 7, it provides over 90% of what they live on.<\/p>\n

Social Security has never missed a payment in its 90-year history. Yet many retirees today are living on the edge. The median benefit\u2014about $1,976 per month\u2014is simply not enough to cover basic expenses in many parts of the country.<\/p>\n

Older women are especially vulnerable. Because they tend to earn less, live longer, and have fewer retirement savings, Social Security is often their only source of income. Without it, elder poverty in the United States\u2014already the highest among G7 countries\u2014would be much worse.<\/p>\n

Q: What are the challenges that Social Security currently faces in meeting the needs of today\u2019s seniors?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

The primary challenge is not<\/strong> demographic. Yes, more people are retiring than ever before\u2014over 60 million Americans now receive Social Security retirement benefits, up from about 32 million in 1983\u2014but we knew this would happen. Back in 1983, Congress believed it had adequately funded the program to prepare for the aging Baby Boomer population.<\/p>\n

What lawmakers did not anticipate was that wage growth would be concentrated at the top, above the Social Security payroll tax cap. As a result, most earnings growth escaped Social Security taxation. Meanwhile, more wages stagnated and a growing share went to cover health insurance\u2014income that is also exempt from Social Security taxes. Wage stagnation, periods of unemployment, and the rise of under-the-table and gig work, where neither employers nor workers contribute to Social Security, have all reduced revenue flowing into the system. That\u2019s why the program is now paying out more than it collects.<\/p>\n

Since 2010, annual costs have exceeded tax income. The system has survived by drawing down the Trust Fund\u2014but that fund is running out. By 2033, unless Congress acts, Social Security will only be able to pay 79% of promised benefits.<\/p>\n

This isn\u2019t a forecast anymore\u2014it\u2019s a countdown. A 21% across-the-board cut would hit everyone \u2013 about $16,500 <\/strong>cut in annual benefits for a typical dual-income couple \u2013 regardless of income.<\/p>\n

Q: Besides Social Security cuts, what challenges face future retirees?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Future retirees\u2014especially Gen X and Millennials\u2014face a far more precarious future because they have fewer defined benefit pensions, and are more likely to rely on volatile market-based savings like 401(k)s. But a 401(k) is better than nothing and 50% of U.S. workers at any one point in time have nothing \u2013 their employers don\u2019t have retirement plans. And while stocks and housing markets have grown, these gains have primarily benefited the wealthy. The median retirement savings for the bottom 50% of Americans is zero.<\/p>\n

Meanwhile out-of-pocket healthcare and long-term care costs are projected to exceed $120,000 for the average person turning 65 today. Most retirees are not prepared to bear that burden, especially with eroding Social Security benefits and Medicaid cuts.<\/p>\n

Older people need Medicaid and so do their family members \u2013 who would have paid if it weren\u2019t for Medicaid. Surprisingly, middle and upper income people will rely on Medicaid more and more for long-term care. Now, over 30% of 70-year-old singles in the bottom third of the income distribution receive Medicaid as does over 10% of singles in the top third if they survive into their 90s. And, middle – income folks who spend at least two years in a nursing home are nine times more likely to be on Medicaid than those who are not.<\/p>\n

Q: Social Security is worth quite a lot for most Americans, right? <\/strong><\/h2>\n

According to PolicyLink and the Urban Institute, the median present value of lifetime Social Security benefits for Gen Z is $410,000 ($439,900 for white non-Hispanic, $359,800 for Hispanic, and $332,700 for Blacks). Research from The New School shows that among near-retirees, Social Security wealth is $188,300 for the bottom 50%, (vital because they have no retirement savings or home equity. For the middle 40%, Social Security wealth is $300,500, worth more than the $200,000 in their retirement accounts and $128,000 in home equity.<\/p>\n

Q: What are the solutions to ensure Social Security can meet current and future needs?<\/strong><\/h2>\n

There\u2019s no mystery here. The solution is revenue. One of the most effective and popular reforms would be to lift or eliminate the cap on earnings subject to the payroll tax. Right now, people stop paying into Social Security once they earn above $168,600. In effect, a millionaire pays a smaller share of their income into Social Security than a middle-class teacher or nurse.<\/p>\n

Raising revenue solutions are included in the proposed Social Security 2100 Act including:<\/p>\n