• Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest finance news and updates directly to your inbox.

Top News

The Real Currency Of Life, According To Naval Ravikant

July 12, 2025

New Bill Would Eliminate Income Taxes on Home Sales

July 12, 2025

Are You a Big, Beautiful Winner or Loser Under Trump’s Tax Law?

July 12, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • The Real Currency Of Life, According To Naval Ravikant
  • New Bill Would Eliminate Income Taxes on Home Sales
  • Are You a Big, Beautiful Winner or Loser Under Trump’s Tax Law?
  • Americans now view this figure as the benchmark for being wealthy
  • Want a Reputation People Trust? Start With These 4 Simple Habits Thought provoking and actionable ways to lead your business to earn trust in your industry
  • Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Now as Wealthy as Warren Buffett
  • People Hate These 10 Phrases in Job Posts and Won’t Even Apply
  • Photos: Allen & Co. Sun Valley Billionaire Summer Camp
Saturday, July 12
Facebook Twitter Instagram
iSafeSpend
Subscribe For Alerts
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
iSafeSpend
Home » A Canadian Tax That Americans Will Love To Hate
Taxes

A Canadian Tax That Americans Will Love To Hate

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 10, 20230 Views0
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Tumblr Telegram

As a kid growing up in suburban Detroit, it was frequently noted that our town “looked down” on Canada . . . literally. It was a bad joke based on a geographical quirk. We lived in the only part of the United States that was due north of Canadian soil.

We soon learned that it wasn’t nice to poke fun at our neighbors. I’ve been atoning for my indiscretions ever since. To that end, I’ll take this opportunity to comment favorably on a recent development in Canadian tax law.

Canada is getting serious about a digital services tax. Americans should be fine with that — despite the hostile reactions in Washington. A bit of context will explain why Canada’s DST proposal is nothing to get worked up about.

The Next Big Thing

DSTs are all the rage. A DST is a gross receipts tax imposed at a low rate on a narrow category of economic activity. By contrast, the corporate income tax is a net-basis tax imposed at much higher rates on a broader range of economic activity. A decade ago, nobody had a DST. Today, a few dozen countries have enacted some version of it, and many others are considering it.

A DST is that rarest of birds — a new tax that’s generally popular with citizens and politicians alike. That’s probably because the tax is perceived as a way to export the local tax burden to nonresident corporations — the same ones that are raking in huge profits and often don’t pay much income tax in the places where they have legions of users.

DSTs are sometimes described as a “backstop” to the conventional corporate income tax, although the description does them a disservice. It’s widely acknowledged that gross receipts are a poor proxy for a company’s profitability. In substance, the DST is closer to a supplemental VAT. It targets the local consumption of digital services, not the profitability that arises from them.

It’s true that DSTs are a unilateral assertion of taxing rights. So what if they are?

A unilateral tax might feel misplaced in an area that’s regularly influenced by bilateral or multilateral cooperation. However, a distinguishing characteristic of DSTs is that they are a destination-based tax — unlike income taxes. No country requires permission from anybody else to enact a destination-based tax. There’s nothing offensive about the unilateral nature of the DST — just as there’s nothing offensive about the unilateral nature of VAT.

Back in 2021 the Canadian Department of Finance started to lay the groundwork for a DST that would be imposed from January 2024, with retroactive effect from January 2022. The United States immediately complained that Canada’s DST proposal was discriminatory because so many of the affected firms were U.S.-based companies. U.S. officials threatened Canada with a retaliatory trade response, as they did to other countries with DSTs.

Two aspects of the U.S. response were flawed.

First, there is nothing about DSTs that’s inherently discriminatory, strictly speaking. If the tax seems discriminatory in effect, that’s because U.S. firms dominate the global tech sector. If Spotify (Sweden), Movistar (Spain), SAP (Germany), or Tencent (China) become big enough, they too will be subject to DSTs. Objectively, nobody who takes a serious look at DSTs would conclude that they’re discriminatory.

Second, the hostile U.S. reaction to DSTs ignores the near certainty that the economic burden of the tax would be passed along to the end users of digital services provided in Canada . . . which is to say, Canadians. Every company that does business in a foreign consumer market is well acquainted with VAT. Those firms possess a lot of expertise in passing the VAT burden on to final consumers. They’ll do the same for DSTs. This process of pricing adjustments has already occurred in other jurisdictions with DSTs. It will happen in Canada, as well.

Bottom line: It should not bother the U.S. government that a foreign government wants to enact a tax that will predominantly be paid by foreign consumers.

The Cool Kids Aren’t Waiting

January 2024 is just around the corner. The world wants to know whether Canada will voluntarily delay its DST. Many other nations are doing just that, adhering to an OECD-brokered agreement.

The idea is that no country involved in the OECD’s inclusive framework (which consists of about 140 nations) would apply its DST until the earlier of January 2025 or the entry into force of a multilateral convention on the OECD’s pillar 1 reform proposal. Conceptually, pillar 1 and DSTs scratch the same itch. The governments of the world have agreed to eliminate their DST regimes if pillar 1 becomes a reality.

Many countries have signed off on the delay. Sure, they’re keen to implement their DSTs, but they don’t want to disrupt the significant progress to date on pillar 1. Canada, however, has not agreed to delay a thing. It recently published revised legislation that makes clear that progress toward DST implementation is not slowing — not even for the demands of its close neighbor and largest trade partner. If you think about it, there’s wisdom in Canada’s approach.

The solution here is simple. Canada should apply its DST from January 2024, as planned, subject to one important caveat: All revenue collected under the DST (initially paid almost entirely by U.S.-based tech firms) shall be fully refunded if pillar 1 eventually takes effect — as evidenced by the successful implementation of a multilateral convention that is scheduled to be unveiled toward the end of 2023.

That’s a fair resolution for both Canada and the United States. It means that Canada would be obliged to return every penny of DST revenue to the U.S. companies that paid it . . . but only if pillar 1 succeeds. If pillar 1 fails for any reason, Canada would retain the DST proceeds. This creates an incentive for the United States to not defeat or indefinitely delay the multilateral convention.

This is the same approach that’s being taken in the United Kingdom and France, which already have DSTs on the books. Basically, Canada is seeking to do the same. When you consider the full picture of what’s happening globally, there’s no reason to look down on that.

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

Building Housing Lowers Prices But “Supply Skeptics” Don’t Believe It

Taxes November 30, 2023

Options To Improve Child Tax Credit For Low-Income Families: An Update

Taxes November 29, 2023

The (Foreign) Gift That Keeps On Giving – IRS Penalties

Taxes November 28, 2023

IRS Doesn’t Need The Blocked Income Tax Regulations In Coca-Cola

Taxes November 27, 2023

Most Married Couples File Taxes Jointly With IRS, But Should You?

Taxes November 26, 2023

Which Trusts Save Taxes, Which Do Not, And Which Are Illegal?

Taxes November 24, 2023
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top News

New Bill Would Eliminate Income Taxes on Home Sales

July 12, 20250 Views

Are You a Big, Beautiful Winner or Loser Under Trump’s Tax Law?

July 12, 20250 Views

Americans now view this figure as the benchmark for being wealthy

July 11, 20250 Views

Want a Reputation People Trust? Start With These 4 Simple Habits Thought provoking and actionable ways to lead your business to earn trust in your industry

July 11, 20250 Views
Don't Miss

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Now as Wealthy as Warren Buffett

By News RoomJuly 11, 2025

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, 62, has reached the same amount of wealth as Warren Buffett.Huang…

People Hate These 10 Phrases in Job Posts and Won’t Even Apply

July 11, 2025

Photos: Allen & Co. Sun Valley Billionaire Summer Camp

July 11, 2025

Social Security & The Big Beautiful Bill

July 11, 2025
About Us

Your number 1 source for the latest finance, making money, saving money and budgeting. follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Email Us: support@isafespend.com

Our Picks

The Real Currency Of Life, According To Naval Ravikant

July 12, 2025

New Bill Would Eliminate Income Taxes on Home Sales

July 12, 2025

Are You a Big, Beautiful Winner or Loser Under Trump’s Tax Law?

July 12, 2025
Most Popular

Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover

July 8, 20251 Views

This $6 Aldi Find Could Save You Hundreds of Dollars

July 5, 20251 Views

The Real Currency Of Life, According To Naval Ravikant

July 12, 20250 Views
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Dribbble
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 iSafeSpend. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.