• Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest finance news and updates directly to your inbox.

Top News

Proposed Law Would Mandate Automatic Enrollment Into Medicare Advantage

July 9, 2025

6 Steps to Creating a Home Inventory — Before It’s Too Late

July 9, 2025

Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover

July 8, 2025
Facebook Twitter Instagram
Trending
  • Proposed Law Would Mandate Automatic Enrollment Into Medicare Advantage
  • 6 Steps to Creating a Home Inventory — Before It’s Too Late
  • Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover
  • How to Turn Summer Travel into More Business and Less Taxes
  • Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic Invest in Teacher AI Training
  • A Code Ninjas Franchise Empowers Youth with Tech & Education
  • Why The SSA’s Big Beautiful Bill Statement Jeopardizes The Agency’s Trust
  • New Tariff Threats Tank Stocks: Find Out How to Protect Your Portfolio
Wednesday, July 9
Facebook Twitter Instagram
iSafeSpend
Subscribe For Alerts
  • Home
  • News
  • Personal Finance
    • Savings
    • Banking
    • Mortgage
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Wealth
  • Make Money
  • Budgeting
  • Burrow
  • Investing
  • Credit Cards
  • Loans
iSafeSpend
Home » Don’t Blame Fitch for Huge U.S. Deficits. Here’s What the Government Could Do.
Investing

Don’t Blame Fitch for Huge U.S. Deficits. Here’s What the Government Could Do.

News RoomBy News RoomAugust 6, 20230 Views0
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Tumblr Telegram

News doesn’t make the markets, the markets make the news. This maxim of traders is humbling, but yet instructive, to any financial journalist.

Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds have leapt in recent days, which the popular media ascribes to the downgrade of Uncle Sam’s credit by Fitch Ratings to AA+ from the previously pristine AAA. This confuses cause and effect, however. Treasury yields have been rising because the U.S. government has been borrowing huge amounts of money—some $1 trillion in this quarter alone.

That is at the core of Fitch’s decision, which, as is usual for credit-rating firms, follows what the market already is saying rather than leading it.

Further, Fitch’s action to strip the U.S. of its AAA rating follows a similar move by Standard & Poor’s in 2011. So the shock of this latest downgrade lacks some of the shock of S&P’s then-unthinkable move.

After all, you can only lose your virginity once. And, as former junk-bond king Michael Milken famously noted, a triple-A is only a downgrade candidate. Anyhow, BCA analysts archly observe that AA+ is the new AAA.

What matters is numbers, not letters. The ratings ultimately reflect a subjective analysis of a borrower’s likelihood to repay, based on its ability as well as its willingness to make good on its debt obligations. The latter figured heavily in both Fitch’s and S&P’s assessments; both criticized the toxic politics that would sacrifice the full faith and credit of the U.S., which Alexander Hamilton famously secured for the young republic.

And it is the numbers that have induced traders and investors to push up yields on longer-dated U.S. government securities to their highest level since last October—and concomitantly pushed down their prices. They see current 10- and 30-year Treasury yields, which have recently climbed above 4%, as too low.

Such levels only seem high in the context of the lowest yields in the 5,000 years of recorded history of interest rates—zero percent and negative in some markets—which were reached in the wake of the Covid-19 crisis. But the market is beginning to anticipate a continued rise in bond yields, which are based on U.S. government borrowing costs, which sets the standard for interest rates.

Not surprisingly, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen took issue with Fitch’s negative assessment, which she said was based on outdated numbers. The strength of the U.S. economy was dismissed by the ratings arbiter, she asserted. Yet that missed the key point. Washington continues to go deeper into debt despite the economy running at full employment.

Rather than blaming the messengers at Fitch, administration officials should heed the message, which originates in the latter’s own numbers. In particular, the U.S. government’s fiscal-2023 deficit is already at 6% of gross domestic product at a time when Uncle Sam should be flush. Deficits of such magnitude are more typical of recession times, when tax receipts shrink and spending rises for unemployment and the like.

And the outlook for the future doesn’t look any better for the out years. For the proximate time, the Treasury recently announced expanded auctions of every maturity, including this coming week’s sales of $103 billion of three-, 10-, and 30-year maturities. At the same time, the Treasury also announced increases of every security, from short-term bills to longer-dated notes and bonds, as well as floating-rate notes and inflation-protected securities, which is at the core of the current backup in yields.

This comes as the Federal Reserve is selling off its holdings of Treasuries and agency mortgage-backed securities. Foreign central banks also are reducing their cache of U.S. debt. All of which means more paper for the private market to absorb.

The simple answer would be to reduce the budget deficit, through cutting spending or increasing revenues. Both are politically unpalatable. But there’s also a stealth solution that’s been successfully implemented before, most notably in the decades following the debt buildup that financed the World War II effort.

It consists of a combination of inflation and financial repression. The latter involves various institutional arrangements that suppress borrowing costs for the government. Inflation boosts the aggregate economy, with higher prices and wages measured in less-valuable dollars, and generates more tax revenue.

This combination was successful in paring debt during the 1945-80 period, wrote Carmen Reinhart and M. Belen Sbrancia in an International Monetary Fund working paper in 2015. These tools, which they described as a tax on bondholders and savers, might be deployed again to cope with the surge in public debt.

To be sure, the Fed’s stated intent is to return inflation back to its 2% target. According to its favorite measure—the core personal consumption expenditure, which excludes food and energy costs—it’s still running at twice that pace, at 4.1% in the 12 months through June. But why is 2% the right number?

That question has been posed by a number of economists, notably Olivier Blanchard, the former chief economist at the IMF and senior fellow at the Peterson Institute, who suggests a higher inflation target of, say, 3%. Wringing out the last bit of inflation could come at the cost of higher unemployment and wouldn’t be worth it, according to adherents of this view. And that extra inflation would swell government revenues.

Hedge fund titan Bill Ackman tweeted (or whatever the appropriate verb for Elon Musk’s redubbed X should be) this past week that he’s shorting long-term Treasury bonds, in part based on the assumption of inflation running at 3% over the long term, which he figures would imply a 5.5% 30-year Treasury yield. While the long bond’s yield has risen sharply of late, to 4.27% on Thursday from 3.84% in mid-July and 3.44% in early December, that 5.5% target implies significant further rises in yield and concurrent price declines. Shorting bonds (which he said he’s doing via options) further provides a hedge against his stocks, which would be vulnerable to declines owing to higher long-term interest rates, he added.

Ultimately, governments across the Group of Seven are likely to enact financial repression through policies similar to Japan’s yield curve control (which it just loosened), according to a new note from Bank of America’s global investment strategy team led by Michael Hartnett. They see that happening “once [the] next recession provokes fiscal policy panic & even higher government default risk.” Such financial repression would be the solution to the Treasury’s debt burden, which they observe will grow by $5.2 billion every day for the next 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office projections.

The problem with long-term U.S. bonds isn’t so much their quality, as the Fitch downgrade suggests, as the quantity needed to fund Washington’s widening budget gap, especially as the normalization of interest rates further adds to its cost. Market players are making that point, and thus the news.

Corrections & Amplifications: The U.S. government’s fiscal-2023 deficit is 6% of gross domestic product. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said government debt is 6% of GDP.

Write to Randall W. Forsyth at randall.forsyth@barrons.com



Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Articles

How to Turn Summer Travel into More Business and Less Taxes

Investing July 8, 2025

Here Are the Traits OpenAI Executives Look For in New Hires

Investing July 7, 2025

The 3 Keys to a Perfect Franchise Fit

Investing July 6, 2025

Final Hours to Get Windows 11 Pro with Copilot for Just $10

Investing July 5, 2025

Why Your Company Needs Flexible Capital (and How to Get It)

Investing July 4, 2025

How the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Could Affect Small Businesses

Investing July 3, 2025
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Demo
Top News

6 Steps to Creating a Home Inventory — Before It’s Too Late

July 9, 20250 Views

Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover

July 8, 20251 Views

How to Turn Summer Travel into More Business and Less Taxes

July 8, 20250 Views

Microsoft, OpenAI, Anthropic Invest in Teacher AI Training

July 8, 20250 Views
Don't Miss

A Code Ninjas Franchise Empowers Youth with Tech & Education

By News RoomJuly 8, 2025

Are you exploring franchise ownership and looking for an opportunity that combines profitability with purpose?…

Why The SSA’s Big Beautiful Bill Statement Jeopardizes The Agency’s Trust

July 8, 2025

New Tariff Threats Tank Stocks: Find Out How to Protect Your Portfolio

July 8, 2025

Siblings With Self-Funded 8-Figure Brand Share Business Tips

July 7, 2025
About Us

Your number 1 source for the latest finance, making money, saving money and budgeting. follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Email Us: support@isafespend.com

Our Picks

Proposed Law Would Mandate Automatic Enrollment Into Medicare Advantage

July 9, 2025

6 Steps to Creating a Home Inventory — Before It’s Too Late

July 9, 2025

Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover

July 8, 2025
Most Popular

Barbara Corcoran Retains Staff With Wild Perks, No Turnover

July 8, 20251 Views

This $6 Aldi Find Could Save You Hundreds of Dollars

July 5, 20251 Views

Proposed Law Would Mandate Automatic Enrollment Into Medicare Advantage

July 9, 20250 Views
Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest Dribbble
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact
© 2025 iSafeSpend. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.